Drawing for FLIGHTVU

USPTO serial 79059135

FLIGHTVU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLIGHTVU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and/or images; telecommunications apparatus; security surveillance, alarms and building control apparatus; video display units; micro-processors; computers and computer programmes; data carriers in the form of tapes and disks; video camera security surveillance apparatus; video multiplexers and video storage and transmission apparatus; all included in this classSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 29, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 24, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance