USPTO serial 79059176
KIDSOLIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3918916Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2011
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIDSOLIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed Olives and olive oils, edible oils | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |