USPTO serial 79059214
OR DMM DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT MODULE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OR DMM DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT MODULE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr.
Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr. St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens LLC986 Bedford StreetStamford, CT 06905-5619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Borescopes for industrial and scientific purposes and parts thereof; illumination apparatus, namely, lights as parts of or special accessories for borescopes in non-medical use; cameras, namely, CCD cameras, for use in industrial endoscopy; microscopes; adapters and cables for connecting cameras to endoscopes; computer hardware, software, and peripherals used to reproduce and record images, for use in industrial endoscopy; computer hardware, software and peripherals used for training and teaching on the use of industrial endoscopes and endoscopic equipment; electronic test and check devices for examining, testing and checking the mechanical function, optical function, magneto-electrical function, polarization, and frequency of endoscopes and endoscopic equipment; transport receptacles, namely, boxes, cases, and packages designed specifically for use in storing and transporting; data processors; blank data media, namely, optical discs, tapes, and magnetic data carriers and computer hardware, software and peripherals for storing and/or converting and/or displaying information obtained from borescopes; remote controls for endoscopes and endoscopic equipment; computer hardware for use in computer networks, computer software use for operating and networking endoscopes and endoscopic equipment; electronic publications, namely, brochures and information sheets relating to medical instruments and apparatus | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general and endoscopic surgery; illumination apparatus as parts of or special accessories for endoscopes in medical use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, brochures and information sheets in the field of medical technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |