USPTO serial 79059238
KÖMAALU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3654990Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 2009
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KÖMAALU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
53840 Troisdorf, DE
DE
53840 Troisdorf, DE
53840 Troisdorf, DE
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by profine GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by profine GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by profine GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by profine GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named KÖMAALU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |