USPTO serial 79059265
KNK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3763314Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2010
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with KNK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rodgers Lunsford III
J. Rodgers Lunsford III SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1230 Peachtree Street, N.E.Suite 3100 - PromenadeATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded DVDs and CD-Roms featuring training information in the field of computer software implementation | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter in the field of information technology, namely, periodic newsletters and trade magazines in the field of computer software, instructional booklets and manuals and project manuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Advertising in the field of information technology, business economics, industrial sciences; providing office functions ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing access to telecommunications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing educational services, namely, conducting workshops, seminars and classroom instruction in the fields of computer software, software training, IT-process training, systems training, IT-project management training, IT- systems change management, and business consulting, business process optimization, business administration, project management, management of organizational change, coaching, business management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development, installation and maintenance of computer software, namely, computer software for enterprise resource planning, document management systems, data and information management, document storage, retrieval and archiving; and computer software services, namely, IT-consulting, technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems, providing remote access, namely, installing software tools on the customer's site to remotely provide software services, namely, installation, configuration, maintenance and trouble shooting in the nature of technical support services of computer software; online help namely, providing computer technology support services, namely, help desk services, implementation, configuration management, installation services and troubleshooting in the nature of technical support services of computer software; industrial analyses, namely, development of customized software for others for use in information services for enterprises, root cause analyses and solution, quality management, crisis management, risk analysis, business process analysis and optimization, business organization analysis and optimization, corporate culture analysis and moderation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Knut Nicholas Krause
- Other trademarks owned by Knut Nicholas Krause
- Other trademarks owned by Knut Nicholas Krause
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KNK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 9, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 5, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |