USPTO serial 79059280
GLOBERIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4322517Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 23, 2013
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOBERIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca B. Lederhouse
PATRICK J JENNINGS PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP2300 N STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, jackets, sweat pants, trousers, raincoats, vests, sweaters, sweat shirts, polo shirts, T-shirts, socks and stockings, gloves and clothing mittens; headgear for wear, namely, hats and caps; boots; tennis shoes; golf shoes; anglers' shoes; garters; sock suspenders; suspenders as braces; waistbands; belts for clothing; footwear other than boots for sport; masquerade costumes; clothes for sports, namely, shirts and pants; boots for sports excluding skating boots with skates attached | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Daiwa Seiko, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Daiwa Seiko, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBERIDE, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBERIDE, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GLOBERIDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 24, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 16, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ZZBX | ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ZZBX | ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |