USPTO serial 79059294
3D OCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3696093Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2009
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with 3D OCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, optical apparatus and instruments, namely, surgical apparatus and instruments for use in ophthalmic surgery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |