USPTO serial 79059311
VERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY P. DELIO
121 WHITNEY AVENUENEW HAVEN, CT 06510-1241UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, namely, electrical standard lamps, wall lamps and ceiling lamps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Furniture upholstered furniture, tables, chairs, shelves, sideboards, furniture, namely, wall units, beds and upholstered beds; mattresses, cushions; mirrors; picture frames | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Textiles and textile goods, namely, bed sheets, calico, buckram, blankets, and throws | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |