USPTO serial 79059366
LASTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3807116Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LASTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Structures for buildings, for supports, for road joints, namely, metal heavy load bearings for bridges and edifices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Structures for buildings, for supports, for road joints, namely, non-metal heavy load bearings for bridges and edifices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAGEBA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Mageba Services & Technology AG
- Other trademarks owned by MAGEBA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MAGEBA S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named LASTO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |