USPTO serial 79059388
DUOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3810954Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metal building materials, namely, plastomeric, bituminous roof sheeting; elastomeric, bituminous roof sheeting; non-metal building panels, namely, bituminous roof sheeting; roof coverings, namely, plastomeric, bituminous roof coatings; bituminous roof sheeting; sealing systems of plastomeric bitumen and plastomeric, bituminous roof coatings and plastomeric, bituminous roof sheeting; sealing systems of plastomeric bitumen and fleece inlays and plastomeric, bituminous roof coatings; sealing systems of plastomeric bitumen and fabric inlays and plastomeric, bituminous roof coatings; sealing systems of plastomeric bitumen and fleece inlays and plastomeric, bituminous roof sheeting; sealing systems of plastomeric bitumen and fabric inlays and plastomeric, bituminous roof sheeting; elastomeric bitumen for use as a prime roof coating; sealing systems of elastomeric bitumen and elastomeric, bituminous roof coatings and elastomeric, bituminous roof sheeting; sealing systems of elastomeric bitumen and fleece inlays and elastomeric, bituminous roof coatings; sealing systems of elastomeric bitumen and fabric inlays and elastomeric, bituminous roof coatings; sealing systems of elastomeric bitumen and fleece inlays and elastomeric, bituminous roof sheeting; sealing systems of elastomeric bitumen and fabric inlays and elastomeric, bituminous roof sheeting; sealing systems of elastomeric bitumen and fabric inlays and fleece inlays sold together as a unit for sealing roofs; sealing systems of elastomeric bitumen and support inlays sold together as a unit for sealing roofs; sealing systems of plastomeric bitumen and fabric inlays and fleece inlays sold together as a unit for sealing roofs; sealing systems of plastomeric bitumen and support inlays sold together as a unit for roof sealing; asphalt building cardboard; asphalt; pitch; bitumen, bituminous products for building, namely, roofs; elastomeric, bituminous adhesive compound in the nature of adhesive mortar for building purposes; elastomeric, bituminous adhesive compounds in the nature of adhesive mortar for building purposes and fleece inlays all sold together as a unit; elastomeric, bituminous adhesive compounds in the nature of adhesive mortar for building purposes and fabric inlays all sold together as a unit; elastomeric, bituminous adhesive compounds in the nature of adhesive mortar for building purposes and support inlays all sold together as a unit; elastomeric, bituminous roof coatings; adhesive compound bitumen for surface sealing, namely, plastomeric bitumen used as an adhesive mortar for building purposes; plastomeric, bitumen used as an adhesive mortar for building purposes and support inlays all sold together as a unit; plastomeric, bitumen used as an adhesive mortar and fleece inlays all sold together as a unit; plastomeric bitumen for use as an adhesive mortar for building purposes and fabric inlays all sold together as a unit; bituminous and dip coats for sealing roofs, in particular elastomer bitumen; asphalt building cardboard and accompanying tarred strips and tracks sold together as a unit for use in building surface sealers and roofing; sealing adhesives, namely, adhesive mortar for building purposes; all aforementioned goods exclusively for surface sealing and not for heat insulation and not for the area of earth and soil engineering | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hans-Peter Richarz
- Other trademarks owned by Hans-Peter Richarz
- Other trademarks owned by Hans-Peter Richarz
- Other trademarks owned by Marcus von Wielemanns
- Other trademarks owned by Marcus von Wielemanns
- Other trademarks owned by Marcus von Wielemanns
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named DUOFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |