CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GERSTNER

USPTO serial 79059463

GERSTNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3810956Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 29, 2010
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with GERSTNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan Behr

Alan Behr Phillips Nizer LLP485 Lexington Avenue14th FloorNew York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Confectionery, namely, truffles and candyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 11, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 17, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 8, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 8, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 3, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 3, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 19, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 29, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 29, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 4, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 3, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 2, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance