USPTO serial 79059622
SECRET DE CARDINALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3708846Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 10, 2009
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECRET DE CARDINALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Solomon
Steven J. Solomon Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th StreetSuite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2021 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |