USPTO serial 79059679
SO'BIO ÉTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SO'BIO ÉTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; toilet water, sachets for perfuming linen, perfumery products, bases for flower perfumes and for plant perfumes, scented microcapsules, incense, scented water, oil for perfumes, shampoos, oil for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic cream, milk for the face and body, cleansing milk for toilet purposes, pomade for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic preparations for baths for non-medical use, bath salts, not for medical purposes, deodorants for personal use; aromatics (essential oils), scented wood, eau-de-Cologne, disinfectant perfumed soaps, lavender water, fumigation preparations (perfumes), bubble baths for non-medical use, cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes, beauty masks, cosmetic suntan preparations, depilatory preparations, cosmetics for animals, make-up removal preparations, lotions for cosmetic purposes, make-up preparations, nail care preparations, cosmetic products used for exfoliation, mint for perfumery, potpourris, soaps for foot perspiration, tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions, scented water, flower and plant extracts (perfumery), mint essence for perfumery; tablets and chewing gum for cosmetic purposes, all these goods being produced by organic farming or made from goods produced by organic farming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |