CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ALICE

USPTO serial 79059683

ALICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3676684Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 1, 2009
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas M. Wilentz

Thomas M. Wilentz Thomas M. Wilentz, Attorney at Law, PLLC75 South Broadway4th FloorWhite Plains, NY 10601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Cases for musical instruments; Japanese plectrums, namely, bachi; tuning apparatus for musical instruments; music instrument stands; turning apparatus for sheet music; string instruments; guitars; musical instruments, namely, lutes; guitar strings; strings for Western musical instrumentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 4, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 8, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 8, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 16, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 5, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2008NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Dec 30, 2008NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 13, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance