Drawing for SIMULECT

USPTO serial 79059709

SIMULECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3639864Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 16, 2009
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SIMULECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maury M. Tepper, III

MAURY M. TEPPER, III TEPPER & EYSTER, PLLC3724 BENSON DRIVERALEIGH, NC 27609UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of disorders of the [ nervous system, ] the immune system [, the cardio-vascular system, the metabolic system, the respiratory system, the musculo-skeletal system, the genitourinary system; for the treatment of inflammatory disorders; ] for use in [ dermatology, oncology, hematology and ] in tissue and organ transplantation [, in ophthalmology, and for gastroenterological disorders; pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of ocular disorders or diseases; for the treatment of bacteria-based diseases; for the treatment of diabetes, anti-infective preparations, antiviral preparations, antibiotics, antifungal preparations ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 23, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 4, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 4, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 19, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 16, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 25, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 1, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 11, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 5, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 13, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 3, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance