USPTO serial 79059727
LPM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LPM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Foundry molds of metal; foundry chill-molds; metallic molds for metal casting | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Desprueing machines; deburring machines; brushing machines; pressure die casting machines; heated and non-heated ladles as parts of low pressure die casting machines; automatic filter loaders for machines; water quenching systems for cast components; die stamping machines; milling machines; compression foundry molding machines; injection molding machines; extrusion molding machines; metal extrusion presses; forging molds; machine parts, namely; molds for use in the manufacture of light alloy wheels, cylinder heads, suspension arms, bedplates and wheel hubs; machine tools for removing waste material | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation of foundry products; installation, maintenance and repair of foundry molds of metal, foundry chill-molds, metallic molds for metal casting, desprueing machines, deburring machines, brushing machines, pressure die casting machines, die stamping machines, milling machines, compression foundry molding machines, injection molding machines, extrusion moldingmachines; machinery maintenance and repair; repair or maintenance of industrial furnaces; repair or maintenance of metalworkingmachines and tools | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |