Drawing for KOYA

USPTO serial 79059854

KOYA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOYA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps; perfume, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; depilatories; make-up removing preparations; lipsticks; face mask; shaving productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Pharmaceutical preparations; medicinal herbs; tisaneSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Leather or imitation leather clothing; belts (clothing); furs (clothing); gloves (clothing); scarves; ties; hosiery; socks; slippers; beach, ski or sports footwear; underwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 1, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 14, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 14, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2008RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance