USPTO serial 79059971
ONPOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONPOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Blinkers (signalling lights); flashing lights (luminous signals); signal bells; signal lanterns; cell switches (electricity); electric switches; automatic time switches; junction boxes (electricity); control panels (electricity); high and low voltage switch panels | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |