USPTO serial 79060025
OR-LIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3619637Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 12, 2009
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OR-LIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC7th FLOOR412 MAIN STHOUSTON, TX 77002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Apparatus and instruments for medical use for body and skin care, namely, intense pulsed light apparatus for cosmetic treatment of the face and skin, intense pulsed light apparatus for hair removal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |