Drawing for MAIA

USPTO serial 79060114

MAIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3725706Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 15, 2009
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C Bruce Hamburg

C Bruce Hamburg Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, PA875 Third Avenue, 8th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for treating metallic, organic and mineral substrates in a vacuum, namely, machines for manufacturing thin optical, transparent, solar technology and wear-resistant coatings with chemical and physical processes, and for ion and plasma treatment, impregnation and heat treatmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 21, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 5, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 26, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 14, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 22, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 22, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 6, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 15, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 29, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 9, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 8, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 18, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance