USPTO serial 79060115
IDENTIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDENTIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Chemical goods for the purposes of dentistry and dental technique, in particular tooth filling materials, impression materials and plating masses, dental materials, namely, materials for dental fillings and for sealing purposes, and materials for making dental impressions, dental adhesives, dental porcelain; disinfectants for hygiene purposes, namely, disinfectants for the skin; medicated compresses; tampons for medical purposes as absorbing material; amalgams of gold for dental purposes; dental cement; bonding agent for tooth prostheses; porcelain for tooth prostheses; tooth lacquers in the nature of conductive lacquers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Dental and dental technique instruments and devices, namely, picks, burrs, mirrors, and surgical pliers, in particular crown ring pliers and dental band moulding pliers, dental contour pliers and moulding spoons; artificial teeth, tooth implants and tooth prostheses; electrotechnical devices for dental purposes, namely, dental drills, artificial jaws; tooth pins; instruments and devices for tooth regulations, namely, clasps, clamps, lingual bars, cast clasps and roach clasps; dental crowns and dental bridges of full ceramics and metal-ceramics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom fabrication of teeth in the nature of dental prosthetics; Services of a dental laboratory, namely, custom fabrication of mouth guards, namely, modelling and producing of mouth guards; services in connection with dental orthopedics, surgical orthodontics, corrective orthodontics and preventive orthodontics, namely, custom fabrication of tooth regulating devices; custom fabrication of dental veneers and dental inlays, custom fabrication of tooth implants and artificial tooth roots | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Services of a dental laboratory; services of a dental laboratory in connection with sliding and telescoping works for manufacturing prostheses and telescopic crowns and conical crowns and double crowns, maxilliary prostheses and mandibular prostheses; services in connection with dental prosthetics, namely, fitting of dental prosthetics; carrying out of casting modelling work for manufacturing tooth prostheses of any type | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | IIOA | INADVERTENTLY ISSUED OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 3, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |