USPTO serial 79060271
SSD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SSD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines using superheated steam, namely, flash dryer machines, ring dryer machines, rotary dryer machines, fluid bed machines and spray dryer machines, all used for the removal of vapor from a moist product; all the aforementioned for the chemical industry, the biotechnology industry, the polymer industry, the power generation industry, the biomass industry, the fertilizer industry, the polymer industry, the power generation industry, the biomass industry, and the pharmaceutical industry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Drying apparatuses using superheated steam, namely, flash dryers, ring dryers, rotary dryers, fluid bed dryers and spray dryers, all the aforementioned for the chemical industry, the biotechnology industry, the biofuel industry, the agri-food industry, the mineral industry, the fertilizer industry, the polymer industry, the power generation industry, the biomass industry, and the pharmaceutical industry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |