Drawing for RKW PROTEC

USPTO serial 79060273

RKW PROTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3689589Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 29, 2009
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RKW PROTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Diliberti

Mark J. Diliberti Foley & Lardner LLP777 E. Wisconsin AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Plastic films as semi-finished goods for further processing in industry and for application in industrial manufacturing processes, non-woven fabrics made of plastics as semi-finished goods for further processing in industry and for application in industrial manufacturing processes, as well as non-woven fabrics mainly made of plastics as semi-finished goods for further processing in industry and for application in industrial manufacturing processes, laminates in the form of multi-layered plastic films as semi-finished goods for further processing in industry and for application in industrial manufacturing processes as well as laminates mainly made of plastic films as semi-finished goods for further processing in industry and for application in industrial manufacturing processesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 25, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 26, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 11, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 6, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 6, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 20, 2014CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 10, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 26, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 22, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance