Drawing for EL GRAN REY

USPTO serial 79060340

EL GRAN REY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EL GRAN REY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Tobacco, namely, cigars, cigarillos, cigarettes, pipe tobacco, roll your own tobacco, chewing tobacco, Smokers' articles, namely, ashtrays for smokers ceramic, wooden or metallic, made of non precious metals, lighters for smokers made of metal or plastic, cigar cutters, humidors made of wood for cigars, matchesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 25, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 1, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 11, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 19, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 18, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 14, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 11, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 19, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 3, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 10, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 30, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION—
Jan 16, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 18, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 18, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance