USPTO serial 79060354
LUKOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4036862Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2011
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LUKOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OTKRYTOE AKTSIONERNOE OBCHTCHESTVO "NEFTYANAYA; KOMPANIYA "LUKOIL"
RU
Other trademarks owned by OTKRYTOE AKTSIONERNOE OBCHTCHESTVO "NEFTYANAYA; KOMPANIYA "LUKOIL"
OTKRYTOE AKTSIONERNOE OBCHTCHESTVO "NEFTYANAYA; KOMPANIYA "LUKOIL"
RU
Other trademarks owned by OTKRYTOE AKTSIONERNOE OBCHTCHESTVO "NEFTYANAYA; KOMPANIYA "LUKOIL"
PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY "OIL COMPANY "LUKOIL"
MOSKVA, RU
Other trademarks owned by PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY "OIL COMPANY "LUKOIL"
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. Lee
David C. Lee Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP2001 K Street N.W.Robert S. Strauss TowerWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [ Demonstration of goods; market study; shop-window dressing; ] presentation of goods on all communication means for retail sales purposes; sales promotion for others; [ distribution of samples; dissemination of advertising material in the nature of leaflets, prospectuses, printed matter and samples; ] advertising [ ; online advertising on a computer network; television advertising; administrative processing of purchase orders; supply services for third parties, namely, purchase of goods and services for third parties ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Retreading of tires; tire repair, namely, vulcanization of tires; washing of cars; washing of vehicles; anti-rust treatment for vehicles; vehicle polishing; vehicle greasing; vehicle service stations for re-fueling and maintenance; vehicle cleaning | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | [ Hotel services; ] fast-food restaurants and snackbars; cafe-restaurants; cafeterias | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OTKRYTOE AKTSIONERNOE OBCHTCHESTVO "NEFTYANAYA; KOMPANIYA "LUKOIL"
- Other trademarks owned by OTKRYTOE AKTSIONERNOE OBCHTCHESTVO "NEFTYANAYA; KOMPANIYA "LUKOIL"
- Other trademarks owned by PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY "OIL COMPANY "LUKOIL"
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named LUKOIL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 26, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 26, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |