Drawing for RANOREX

USPTO serial 79060433

RANOREX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3718757Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 1, 2009
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with RANOREX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

Martin R. Greenstein TechMark a Law Corporation4820 Harwood Road, 2nd FloorSan Jose, CA 95124UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer programs for automating software testing processesACTIVE—
042Design for new computer software for others; development of new products for others in the fields of computer programmingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 31, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 3, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 30, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 21, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 18, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 11, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 1, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2009WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2009WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 20, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance