Drawing for MSD

USPTO serial 79060468

MSD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MSD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Rubber, gutta-percha, asbestos gum, mica and goods made from these materials, not included in other classes; products made of semi-processed plastics; packing, stopping and insulating materials; non-metallic flexible pipesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Games and toys; gymnastic and sports articles, not included in other classes; decorations for Christmas treesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 1, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 14, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 2, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 22, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance