USPTO serial 79060655
VUDU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3763319Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2010
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VUDU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORBERTO COSTA; REPRESENTAÇÃO EXPORTAÇÃO,; IMPORTAÇÃO, LDA
FELGUEIRAS, PT
Other trademarks owned by NORBERTO COSTA; REPRESENTAÇÃO EXPORTAÇÃO,; IMPORTAÇÃO, LDA
NORBERTO COSTA; REPRESENTAÇÃO EXPORTAÇÃO,; IMPORTAÇÃO, LDA
FELGUEIRAS, PT
Other trademarks owned by NORBERTO COSTA; REPRESENTAÇÃO EXPORTAÇÃO,; IMPORTAÇÃO, LDA
NORBERTO COSTA; REPRESENTAÇÃO EXPORTAÇÃO,; IMPORTAÇÃO, LDA
FELGUEIRAS, PT
Other trademarks owned by NORBERTO COSTA; REPRESENTAÇÃO EXPORTAÇÃO,; IMPORTAÇÃO, LDA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raj Abhyanker
Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern AveTempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | bathing trunks; bath slippers; swimsuits; knitted smocks; smocks; boots; shoes; beach shoes; ski boots; trousers; shirts; vests; coats; jackets; belts; slips; coveralls; leotards; sports shoes, namely, training shoes and exercise footwear; corsets; fur stoles; suits; ties; underwear; skirts; sandals; T-shirts; dresses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORBERTO COSTA; REPRESENTAÇÃO EXPORTAÇÃO,; IMPORTAÇÃO, LDA
- Other trademarks owned by NORBERTO COSTA; REPRESENTAÇÃO EXPORTAÇÃO,; IMPORTAÇÃO, LDA
- Other trademarks owned by NORBERTO COSTA; REPRESENTAÇÃO EXPORTAÇÃO,; IMPORTAÇÃO, LDA
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named VUDU
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |