Drawing for IIC

USPTO serial 79060739

IIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Lockable metal boxes for tools; metal lockable chests for tools; containers of common metal for tools; tools boxes made of metal; metal boxes being containers for tools; metal tool chests; metal tool storage containers; metal boxes being containers for tools that recognise the presence and/or absence of tools; metal boxes being containers for tools that include tool management systems; metal boxes being containers for tools that include computerised and electronic systems; metal boxes being containers for tools that include recesses for tools with corresponding shapes; metal boxes being containers for tools that include electronic access systems including swipe cards and keypads; metal boxes being containers for tools including a communication interface for communicating with other electronic devicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Computer engineering consultancy services; consultancy services relating to product engineering; engineering consultancy; engineering consultancy for automotive components systems and accessories; computer aided engineering; computer modeling; engineering consulting for tool storage systems; computer aided design; engineering consultancy relating to computer programming, design, manufacture, materials, to design modelling testing; engineering design, and consultancy, technical consultancy services relating to marine engineering; engineering design and consultancy; advisory services relating to industrial design, design of engineering products, computer software design, design engineering, transmission systems, tool cabinets and systems to track hand tools; computer aided design engineering services; computer aided design for manufacturing operations; computer assisted engineering design; computer systems design; design feasibility studies; design of land vehicles; design of motor vehicle parts, storage systems, tools and tool storage units, tooling for the production of land vehicle parts; design services, design services for parts of machines, parts of motor vehicles, products, computer systems, electrical and electronic systems; engineering services relating to the design of electronic, systems; technical assessments relating to design; vehicle design services; vehicle engine design servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 14, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 21, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 21, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 6, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 22, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 22, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 21, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2008RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Dec 6, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 20, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance