Drawing for HIPPO

USPTO serial 79060764

HIPPO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3679983Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 2009
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIPPO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Catherine Merz

Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 MADISON STREET, SUITE AOak Park, IL 60302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software, namely, software for document management, content management software and information management softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Design, installation, updating and maintenance of software, namely, software for document management, content management software and information management software; technical consulting in the field of software use, namely, software for document management, content management software and information management software; providing use of on-line nondownloadable software for document management, content management and information managementSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 8, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 28, 2015EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2015PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Oct 20, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 8, 2015715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 8, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 8, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 23, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 24, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance