Drawing for ROSAVATE

USPTO serial 79060832

ROSAVATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3728541Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 22, 2009
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROSAVATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Mathew Lombard

G MATHEW LOMBARD LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP305 BROADWAYFL 7NEW YORK, NY 10007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skin and scalp preparations; skin soaps; disposable impregnated wipes containing non-medicated skin care preparations; non-medicated sunscreen and sunblock; disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for personal hygiene; preparations for personal hygiene, namely, body deodorantSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
005Medical, medicated and veterinary preparations for the treatment of skin disorders of mammals or animals; medicinal and veterinary sprays for the treatment of skin disorders of mammals or animals; medicinal preparations for the treatment of infectious diseasesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 3, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 20, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 29, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 29, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 29, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 29, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 22, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 6, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 13, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance