Drawing for RAYTEC VISION

USPTO serial 79060851

RAYTEC VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAYTEC VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sensor sorting apparatus, with an electro-pneumatic ejection component, equipped with near infrared technology to determine the degree of ripeness and/or the presence of organic or inorganic foreign bodies in fruit and vegetables; camera sorting apparatus, with a suction ejection component, for use in fruit and vegetable production processes; X-ray inspection systems for checking cans, glass jars, bottles and cardboard packaging therefor; X-ray inspection systems for checking packed and bulk products in order to remove from the production process any non-conforming products and/or those suspected to contain foreign bodies, such as glass, stones, metal and bones; camera sorting apparatus, with an air jet ejection component; X-ray inspection systems for checking liquid and pumping products; machines for detecting the presence of foreign bodies in packed and bulk food productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 24, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 22, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 15, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance