Drawing for PICHLER

USPTO serial 79060909

PICHLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3731561Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 29, 2009
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PICHLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey D. Sanok

Jeffrey D. Sanok CROWELL & MORING LLPP.O. BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Textile fabric goods, namely, [ curtains, ] household linen, table [ and bed ] linen, and fabrics for the aforementioned goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 29, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 5, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 21, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 23, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 29, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 23, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 18, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 22, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2008SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance