Drawing for STRI-PEXAN

USPTO serial 79061051

STRI-PEXAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRI-PEXAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Preparations for personal and beauty care, namely, skin cleansing lotions, skin cleansing gels, facial creams, facial lotions, body lotions; anti-aging facial care products, namely, facial creams and facial lotions; treatment kit which can reduce the effect of wrinkles comprised of facial creams and facial lotions; moisturizing creams; wellness products, namely, facial lotions, moisturizing creams and body lotions; massage creams, body soaps, perfumes and essential oils for personal use, hair lotions, and toothpastesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 11, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 25, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 25, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 25, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 13, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 14, 2009OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2009OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 14, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance