USPTO serial 79061067
COMFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3767564Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2010
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with COMFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin W. Guynn
Kevin W. Guynn GREER, BURNS & CRAIN, LTD.200 W. Madison St.Suite 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine-driven devices for the chemical, glass, cement, and quarrying industries for ore and mineral processing and slag comminution, namely, systems comprising milling machines, and limestone, stone, clinker, raw ore, mineral material, and slag crushing machines and grinding machines with separating machines and dedusting appliances, namely, milling machines and raw ore and mineral material, clinker and slag crushing machines in the nature of vertical milling machines and roller industrial machine presses and component and replacement parts of the aforementioned milling and crushing machines for comminution of hard materials, coarse and fine comminution for the chemical, glass, cement, and quarrying industries for ore and mineral processing and slag comminution, excluding bearing machine parts; separating machines in the nature of sifters for classifying and separating, and their component parts, namely, vertical sifters, drum sifters and air flow sifters for use in separating target materials for mixtures of materials and component and replacement parts of the aforementioned separating machines for the chemical, glass, cement, and quarrying industries for ore and mineral processing and slag comminution, excluding bearing machine parts; grinding machines and component and replacement parts of the aforementioned grinding machines for comminution and classifying, for the chemical, glass, cement, and quarrying industry, for ore and mineral processing and slag comminution, excluding bearing machine parts; dedusting appliances, namely, filters for mills for the chemical, glass, cement and quarrying industry, filters for heat exchangers for the chemical, glass and cement industry, filters for clinker coolers for the cement industry; cyclones, ventilators as components or replacement parts of any of the foregoing machines, and suction hoods in the nature of pumps being machine parts, and component and replacement parts of the aforementioned dedusting appliances, excluding bearing machine parts | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Metal treatment, namely, metal processing; destruction of refuse and waste; millworking, namely, milling of stone, glass, slag, ores and minerals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering in the field of plant construction and industrial design; technical computer project management in the field of plant construction, for the chemical, glass, cement, quarrying, ore, and mineral industries; provision of expert reports in the field of engineering; technical research for others related to design, construction, and operation of processing plants and equipment in the chemical, glass, cement, quarrying, ore and mineral industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KHD Humboldt Wedag GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by KHD Humboldt Wedag GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by KHD Humboldt Wedag GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COMFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |