USPTO serial 79061097
TRUEFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3818442Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2010
- Examiner
- HAMPTON, CHARISMA
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRUEFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Auburn Hills, MI, US
Auburn Hills, MI, US
Auburn Hills, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeannine Rittenhouse
Jeannine Rittenhouse IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights RoadSuite 125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles [ egg incubators ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking, life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, optical inspection apparatus for industrial use; [ photographic cameras, video cameras, motion picture cameras; ] apparatus and instruments for conducting, distributing, transforming, accumulating, regulation or control of electric current; [ apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; blank magnetic data carriers; recording discs, namely, blank recordable optical disc; blank computer discs, blank magnetic discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated equipment; computer equipment, namely, computer mother boards, computer mouse, mouse pads, wrist rests for use with computers, computer cables; fire extinguishers; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment; ] recorded computer programs for processing data in the fields of generation, transmission, distribution and industrial use of electrical power, supercharging of internal combustion engines, remote heating, building service systems and off shore and marine technology | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| May 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |