USPTO serial 79061103
OZPIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3651442Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2009
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OZPIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatus for cooking, namely, cooktops; apparatus for cooking out of doors, namely, barbecue grills; barbecue cooking apparatus, namely, barbecues; stoves for cooking, namely, coal stoves | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Karalee Investments Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Karalee Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Karalee Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Karalee Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named OZPIG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |