Drawing for I.NOVA

USPTO serial 79061274

I.NOVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3899282Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 4, 2011
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I.NOVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Patch

Andrew J. Patch YOUNG & THOMPSON209 MADISON ST., STE. 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, building stones, cement mixes, slag cement, cement mortar roofing tiles, cement mortar slates, hydraulic cement, Portland blast-furnace slag cement, Portland cement, roofing cement, silica cement, namely, pozzolanic cement, slag-lime cement, mortar, concrete, hydraulic binder cement, cement and concrete aggregates containing natural or recycled granular materials for the building industry, building limes, granite sands, sandstone for building, artificial stones, common sheet glass for building, terra cotta bricks for use as building materials, non-metallic rigid pipes for building, asphalt, pitch and bitumen, non-metallic transportable buildings, and monuments, not of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Engineering services; industrial analysis and research in the field of cementitious building materials; research and development in the field of cementitious building materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 19, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 18, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 11, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 11, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 4, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD—
Jul 30, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 2, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 3, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 4, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 19, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 21, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 11, 2010GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 17, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 16, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 7, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2009ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 22, 2009MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jun 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance