USPTO serial 79061288
MW3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3781283Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 27, 2010
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MW3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Zaccaria
JOHN ZACCARIA NOTARO & MICHALOS P.C.100 DUTCH HILL ROAD, SUITE 110ORANGEBURG, NY 10962UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Access control apparatus and devices for controlling access, namely, one-time-password-devices in the nature of electronic card readers; software, magnetic cards, memory cards and computer hardware for identification, authentication, verification and/or access to data, to programming, to Websites, to databanks and/or to networks; software and electronic equipment in the nature of computer hardware for processing, handling and comparison of data; software and electronic equipment in the nature of computer hardware for identification and verification of individuals by means of electronic data in the use of access control systems by electronic means and more specifically via the Internet; apparatus and systems for identification, monitoring, protection and security, not included in other classes, namely, access control and alarm monitoring systems; mobile or wireless access control systems, namely, computer programs for the enabling of access or entrance control; apparatus used for security of banking operations and in the field of electronic data transmission, namely, OTP-devices in the nature of electronic card readers; software for securing the access to websites by verifying the identity of the person who wants access to the website, and legal authentication of data by computers; software for remote access control to computer and telecommunication networks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design, establishment and commissioning of electronic apparatus and software for identifying individuals, namely, product development; design, development and maintenance of software; services rendered by information technology specialists in the field of security and authentication in the telecommunications field, namely, information technology consultation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Security services for the protection of property and individuals, together with the use of electronics, including identification, access control and surveillance services, namely, security guard services; providing advice, information and intelligence on the use and application of apparatus and systems for security, monitoring, identification and control and more particularly with regard to apparatus, instruments, software, magnetic cards, memory cards or other computer hardware for identification, authentication, verification and access to data, to programming, to Websites, to data banks and to networks, namely, security consultancy | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anton Dreesmann
- Other trademarks owned by Anton Dreesmann
- Other trademarks owned by Anton Dreesmann
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MW3
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |