Drawing for COMACCHIO

USPTO serial 79061306

COMACCHIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3746947Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 9, 2010
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with COMACCHIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. EGBERT

JOHN S. EGBERT Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hydraulic drill; drill rigs on truck, hydraulic drill rigs, movable drilling machines, hydraulic excavatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 21, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 22, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 23, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 19, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 19, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 19, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 1, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 24, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance