Drawing for RÉSERVE LA JARDINIÈRE

USPTO serial 79061392

RÉSERVE LA JARDINIÈRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RÉSERVE LA JARDINIÈRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 17, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 14, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 17, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 17, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 22, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance