Drawing for NEOVIA

USPTO serial 79061395

NEOVIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3864313Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 19, 2010
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEOVIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Innis

Mary Innis Innis Law Group LLC321 N. Clark Street; Suite 2465Chicago, IL 60654UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Foodstuffs for animalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 6, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 30, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 30, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 23, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2019CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 17, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 17, 2019CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 17, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 16, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 22, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 29, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 29, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 19, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2011FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 21, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 19, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 3, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 3, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 21, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 6, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance