USPTO serial 79061473
VIDREPUR GLASS MOSAIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3728549Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 22, 2009
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIDREPUR GLASS MOSAIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN ALUMIT
JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 South Jackson Street, Suite 200Glendale, CA 91205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, soffites, fascia, composite panels, and glass mosaics for use in swimming pools; non-metallic linings and cladding for building; asphalt, pitch and bitumen; non-metallic transportable buildings; non-metallic monuments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |