Drawing for SISTINA

USPTO serial 79061683

SISTINA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3712229Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 17, 2009
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SISTINA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, sparkling wines, alcoholic beverages, except beer, liqueursSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 15, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 9, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 20, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 24, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 24, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance