USPTO serial 79061723
EITECH GERMANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3725726Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 15, 2009
- Examiner
- SAPP, HEATHER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with EITECH GERMANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert N. Cook
Robert N. Cook Whitham & Cook, P.C. | W&C IP11491 SUNSET HILLS ROADSUITE 340RESTON, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | [ Manual, electric, electronic, magnetic and/or optical sleight of hand games; automatic sleight of hand games, other than coin-operated and not adapted for use with television receivers only; ] indoor games, namely, board games and games with moveable playing pieces, namely, running games, car games, or steeplechase games; [ raffle games and games of chance; games with small moveable playing pieces, balls or discs, namely, roulette games; billiards, table skittles or bowling games; ] games of skill or patience, namely, puzzles or games containing pieces for moving, sliding, sticking or putting together; [ shooting, sling and throwing games; spinning games and dice games; dominoes, Mah-jong games; question and answer games; horoscope games; war games; financial and economic games; model theaters with puppets and marionettes; shadow puppet theaters; magic games; indoor games as a miniature imitation of open-air games or open-air sporting events; parts of the above-mentioned goods, included in this class; sporting apparatus and sporting articles, included in this class for outdoor games, namely, shooting, sling and throwing games, games of skill, table tennis or badminton, skittle games, including skittle games with tethered balls, sphere games, games with pieces for sliding, namely, curling or shuffleboard games, games with pieces suspended or swinging on threads, ball games, games similar to volleyball and obstacle races; parts of the above-mentioned goods included in this class; manual, automatic, other than coin-operated and not adapted for use with television receivers only, electric, electronic, magnetic and/or optical toys, namely, toy vehicles for children; ] scale model vehicles and accessories therefor, namely, rails, points, signals, vehicle lanes, buildings, landscape imitations and tunnels; toy figures, namely, toy animals, toy animals for riding, dolls and marionettes; [ accessories for dolls and doll houses, namely, dolls' houses, dolls' shops, dolls' kitchens, dolls' furniture, dolls' clothes, dolls' shoes, and dolls' wigs; ] scale models of machines, equipment, apparatus, motors, tools, buildings, furnishings and everyday articles; toys driven by steam, gas, compressed air, springs, stretchable rubber bands and electromotors; flying toys, namely, toy balloons, toy kites, toy planes, toy parachutes, starting and catapulting devices, guidance strings and windlass for flying toys; [ noisemakers and musical toys; ] sand toys; [ swimming and water toys; inflatable toys; soap-bubble toys; children's swimming pools; magic toys; war games and toys, namely, toy weapons, and toy detonators; caps and percussion caps for toys; dice; shakers, namely, dice shakers; darts; targets; toy balls; marbles; game balls; toy hoops; spinning tops; ] building blocks; kits for building, namely, toy construction sets composed primarily of metal and plastic, and toy construction sets for constructing solar-powered toy vehicles, airplanes, wind generators and helicopters; [ rocking horses; hobby horses; ] parts of the aforementioned goods [ included ] in this class | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eichsfelder Technik eitech GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Eichsfelder Technik eitech GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Eichsfelder Technik eitech GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named EITECH GERMANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 6, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |