USPTO serial 79061783
AMIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, information processing and word processing devices and equipment compiled on this basis; additional, peripheral and stand-alone devices as well as the relevant accessories, namely, data input devices, magnetic tapes and discs, disquettes and cassettes, modems, data storage devices, memory expansion devices, converters, data output printers and writers, display devices, terminals, disk, tape, disquette/cassette drives, formatting and interface devices, control devices; devices for the functional combination of several computers into a single information processing system; programs for computers and software irrespective of the recording and transmission medium, namely, software which can be recorded on a magnetic medium or downloaded from an external computer network, all the aforesaid goods exclusively for the field of automobile sales, for the domain of finance accounting, for purchase and sale, for the organization and management of garages, including maintenance and repair of vehicles, the management of spare parts, the EDP-conception and document archiving field included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |