USPTO serial 79061867
ODC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3757727Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2010
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ODC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C Bruce Hamburg
C BRUCE HAMBURG Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, PA875 Third Avenue, 8th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mechanical classifying and separating systems for separation and classifying of solids from liquid substances within or in combination with grinding or dispersing equipment, namely, machines for separating grinding beads from high or low viscous material; Separating machines for separating fine from coarse material; Separating machines for separating solid material from fluids; Separating machines for separating liquids from solids without sieves; Separating machines with spiral shaped channels; Rotating separating machines without sieves; Separating machines for bead mills for retention of the beads in the grinding container; Rotating separating machines to retain beads in the grinding container | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Netzsch Feinmahltechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Netzsch Feinmahltechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Netzsch Feinmahltechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named ODC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |