Drawing for TRIPOLI

USPTO serial 79062015

TRIPOLI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3763334Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 23, 2010
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TRIPOLI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle E. Tochtrop

Michelle E. Tochtrop CHRISMAN GALLO TOCHTROP LLC6509 Brecksville Road #31550Independence, OH 44131-4854United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recordable and downloadable computer software for modeling and simulation in the field of ionizing particle transportACTIVE—
042[ Design, maintenance and updating of computer software for modeling and simulation in the field of ionizing particle transport ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 14, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
May 14, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 14, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 1, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 1, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
May 1, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 1, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2021INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 17, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 4, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 20, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 30, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 8, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 4, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 4, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 4, 2016C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 4, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 22, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2012CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 19, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 12, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 9, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 8, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 9, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 6, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance