Drawing for EPLUS

USPTO serial 79062047

EPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3715441Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 24, 2009
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith R. Obert

Keith R. Obert Ware, Fressola, Maguire & Barber LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5P.O. Box 224Monroe, CT 06468

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in the manufacture of solar cells, namely, diffusion chemicals, masking chemicals, photoresists; [ chemical pastes for forming electrodes, namely, anode paste and cathode paste; chemical solutions for forming electrodes, namely, plating solutions; chemicals for use in the production of semi-conductors, namely, diffusion chemicals, etching chemicals, masking chemicals, photoresists; ] industrial chemicals; chemical preparations for scientific purposes [ ; photographic chemicals ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
017[ Pastes for forming insulating layers, namely, insulating plaster; electrical insulating materials, namely, electrical insulating pastes, electrical insulating tapes, electrical insulating paints ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 16, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 24, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 2, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 3, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 25, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 25, 201671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
May 25, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 7, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 24, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 23, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance