USPTO serial 79062133
ROCKLEA ROAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3828414Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 2010
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ROCKLEA ROAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd
Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd
Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd
INGLEBURN, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Van Kirk
Jennifer Van Kirk Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie, LLP201 EAST WASHINGTON ST., SUITE 1200PHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chocolate products, namely, chocolate, [ chocolate beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based, chocolate biscuits, ] chocolate bars, [ chocolate cake, ] chocolate candy, [ chocolate caramel wafers, chocolate chips, chocolate coated fruits, ] chocolate coated nuts, [ chocolate topping, chocolate syrups, spread containing chocolate and nuts, chocolate wafers, edible chocolate decorations for cakes, chocolate in the shape of eggs, ] chocolate flavoured confectionery, namely, chocolate flavoured candy, [ chocolate flavoured jellies including jelly beans, chocolate flavoured lollypops, and chocolate flavoured pastilles, chips for baking, chocolate flavouring syrup, chocolate fudge, chocolate marzipan, chocolate pastries, chocolate sauce, chocolate substitutes, chocolate truffles, chocolate waffles, ] chocolate marshmallows, [ chocolate granola-based snack bars, ] candy covered in chocolate [, Turkish delight coated in chocolate, confectionery, namely, liquorice, almond paste, cocoa-based ingredient in confectionery products, confectionery chips for baking, frozen yoghurt confectionery ices, fruit jelly confectionery, frozen confectionery, liquorices, crystal sugar pieces, namely, lollypops, marshmallow topping, candy mints, confectionery, namely, pastilles, peanut butter confectionery chips, snack foods, namely, chocolate covered cereal based snack foods, cereal based snack foods, corn based snack foods, grain based snack foods, snack foods made primarily from a mixture of cereals containing nuts and dried fruit ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by DL Assets Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ROCKLEA ROAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |